CryptoCardia
CryptoCardia
[Transaction-Governed Security]
[Execution-time security model]

Transaction-Governed Security

:: evaluate_intent(action)

Transaction-Governed Security treats every action as a proposal, not an assumption.

Intent is evaluated before it is allowed to become execution.

Policy, context, and risk decide the outcome.

Execution is a consequence, not a given.

[Core shift]

Security moves from monitoring to control.

Most security systems observe what already happened. They detect anomalies, raise alerts, and respond after execution.

Transaction-Governed Security changes the control point. Every high-risk action must pass a decision gate before it is allowed to execute.

[Execution-time security]

Possession is not authorization.

Traditional systems assume that if a request is signed, authenticated, or originates from a trusted environment, it should be allowed.

TGS assumes the opposite. Keys can be stolen. Apps can be compromised. Clients can be controlled.

Authorization must be independent, contextual, and enforced at execution time.

[Why this matters]

Built for irreversible systems.

Banks, fintechs, treasuries, and infrastructure providers all operate systems where mistakes cannot be undone.

Once a payment settles. Once funds move. Once an action executes.

Security after the fact is already too late.

[What this enables]

Deterministic control at the point of execution.

  • • Enforce policy before payments, transfers, or approvals execute.
  • • Apply risk scoring to real intent, not historical behavior.
  • • Require step-up authorization for high-impact actions.
  • • Prevent catastrophic loss instead of investigating it.
[The realization]

This is not fraud detection.

Transaction-Governed Security is not another detection layer.

It is a permission layer for execution.

A system that decides whether an action is allowed to exist at all.